HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Esko, Minnesota

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Esko.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint4,992.3 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth46.6 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence83.3 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty59.8 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal32.7 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Esko
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Esko. The latest 2025 raster shows 4,992 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 12th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities and the 61st percentile nationally. Carlton County reports 13,759 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Rock Creek, Minnesota, 70 miles away with 19,464 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureHIGH
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 12th percentile among analyzed Minnesota localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles4,992mapped acres · 0.397% of radius · 2025

12th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities · 61th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Esko · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
22448
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
22448 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0c635b93fe52e37234dc5cf6dc44
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

83.3 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 1,709 acres · 9th regional percentile · 48th national percentile2009: 1,970 acres · 9th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2010: 941 acres · 7th regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2011: 4,000 acres · 9th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2012: 2,405 acres · 6th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2013: 1,715 acres · 5th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2014: 2,478 acres · 6th regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2015: 2,268 acres · 6th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2016: 1,755 acres · 5th regional percentile · 47th national percentile2017: 3,511 acres · 7th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2018: 2,877 acres · 7th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2019: 1,697 acres · 6th regional percentile · 46th national percentile2020: 2,023 acres · 7th regional percentile · 48th national percentile2021: 1,139 acres · 6th regional percentile · 44th national percentile2022: 1,668 acres · 7th regional percentile · 49th national percentile2023: 1,395 acres · 7th regional percentile · 47th national percentile2024: 882 acres · 4th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2025: 4,992 acres · 12th regional percentile · 61st national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

46.6production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
13,759 acres

Carlton County · 2022

How calculated

Carlton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27017:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
13,759 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1306a8c6bcca821c53a5dc55590c
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
156 farms

Carlton County · 2022

How calculated

Carlton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27017:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
156 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2fd9b95b1d4d140f0958550e68c3
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
202 acres

Carlton County · 2022

How calculated

Carlton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27017:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
202 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:49b7e0324ef627f4f2a660565ec1
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
3 farms

Carlton County · 2022

How calculated

Carlton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27017:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:08aa1a5096d41c6bf725f07406fb
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
1.5 percent

Carlton County · 2022

How calculated

Carlton County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27017:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:467d045f3b61f65068f2be83655e
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
18,633 tons

Carlton County · 2022

How calculated

Carlton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27017:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
18,633 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ee603a9a694417dab5595255c0da
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.4 tons/acre

Carlton County · 2022

How calculated

Carlton County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27017:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9f9911f0c328a448b1c9dcda2883
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Carlton County · 2022

How calculated

Carlton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27017:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8d90febca6b323050a2605927d22
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
7,167 head

Carlton County · 2022

How calculated

Carlton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27017:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,167 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d80e4e1e9fd6c5a153fa01da9e21
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Carlton County · 2022

How calculated

Carlton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27017:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fdbf77adcb4b7a1ba5a9686d8ef5
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
556 head

Carlton County · 2022

How calculated

Carlton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27017:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
556 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e7e67be5a5755bc7018395a38718
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
2.9 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Carlton County · 2022

How calculated

Carlton County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27017:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0d887082d151ad182ead8a5641ec
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation32.7 in
How calculated

CLOQUET, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a449d42fafa46e07661857426e0a
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature39.7 °F
How calculated

CLOQUET, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b94d0c4c576e8b0b8f06643540a5
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance7.2 miles
How calculated

CLOQUET, MN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Esko reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:943713cadd6921abb1dd4210db98
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Esko · 2026

How calculated

Esko · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d1114cba184d3e14eed6d06b883d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Esko · 2026

How calculated

Esko · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9e773438a859114398a8227a37d3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
58.9 percent

Esko · 2026

How calculated

Esko · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2f1fb980a2a82d96a6c53a17a156
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D3 category

Esko · 2026

How calculated

Esko · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c8e96a4902ebbf75af995e689fc4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
71.8 0-100

Esko · 2026

How calculated

Esko · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:745978546b976cd9e4febf8002bb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Esko · 2026

How calculated

Esko · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9e0469665a1e73d7fe78ff954cd3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
29 weeks

Esko · 2026

How calculated

Esko · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1ed4743d8812a6f6ea3ab5f854d4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20.4 0-100

Esko · 2026

How calculated

Esko · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:06463bdfc08e64d0c1d62a17fa43
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
58.4 0-100

Esko · 2026

How calculated

Esko · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:60ddb4117c5ae1e4bc7f47f6b5d2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
53.2 0-100

Esko · 2026

How calculated

Esko · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ad1078d0bb459dd6acadcc6bd237
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
67.1 percent

Esko · 2026

How calculated

Esko · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d0098f757969e66728c0fd2e4f8e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
51.8 percent

Esko · 2026

How calculated

Esko · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:986486c6b540cf10398cb0454444
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

59.8sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Rock Creek, Minnesota70.1 mi19,464 ac96.52. Alfalfa Hay in Henriette, Minnesota68.1 mi19,009 ac94.83. Alfalfa Hay in Quamba, Minnesota67 mi18,687 ac93.74. Alfalfa Hay in Pine City, Minnesota66.4 mi18,644 ac93.55. Alfalfa Hay in Lewis, Wisconsin68.3 mi17,654 ac89.66. Alfalfa Hay in Siren, Wisconsin64.4 mi16,224 ac84.37. Alfalfa Hay in Brook Park, Minnesota62.3 mi16,158 ac84.18. Alfalfa Hay in Grantsburg, Wisconsin65.6 mi16,165 ac849. Alfalfa Hay in Spooner, Wisconsin65.3 mi14,792 ac78.710. Alfalfa Hay in Webster, Wisconsin57.4 mi13,516 ac74.2
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Esko?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Carlton Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Esko

Barley Hay in Esko, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Esko, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Esko, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Esko, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Esko, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Esko, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 72 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.