Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Breckenridge, Michigan

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Breckenridge.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint27,525.4 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth84.6 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence92.5 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty38.8 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal34.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Breckenridge. The latest 2025 raster shows 27,525 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 76th percentile among 745 analyzed Michigan localities and the 91st percentile nationally. Gratiot County reports 7,881 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Crystal, Michigan, 25 miles away with 53,233 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 76th percentile among analyzed Michigan localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

92.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 43,081 acres · 79th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2009: 38,746 acres · 74th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2010: 61,512 acres · 70th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2011: 42,984 acres · 64th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2012: 45,921 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2013: 41,434 acres · 63rd regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2014: 38,187 acres · 61st regional percentile · 91st national percentile2015: 44,443 acres · 69th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2016: 44,437 acres · 74th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2017: 47,946 acres · 77th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2018: 50,383 acres · 75th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2019: 62,983 acres · 81st regional percentile · 95th national percentile2020: 55,539 acres · 78th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2021: 61,016 acres · 81st regional percentile · 95th national percentile2022: 56,469 acres · 81st regional percentile · 95th national percentile2023: 59,109 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 96th national percentile2024: 30,564 acres · 80th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2025: 27,525 acres · 76th regional percentile · 91st national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

84.6production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
7,881 acres

Gratiot County · 2022

How calculated

Gratiot County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26057:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,881 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:99eb3102c39433b086a9648a0541
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
138 farms

Gratiot County · 2022

How calculated

Gratiot County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26057:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
138 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b93a505c51ebd5c3d2fafacf07c5
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
78 acres

Gratiot County · 2022

How calculated

Gratiot County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26057:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
78 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3bc4ecf48457d46545673d679185
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
8 farms

Gratiot County · 2022

How calculated

Gratiot County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26057:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:19d802fd60e3386d408c73e33115
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
1 percent

Gratiot County · 2022

How calculated

Gratiot County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26057:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bd9d4589524e3abafd15b100138a
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
12,716 tons

Gratiot County · 2022

How calculated

Gratiot County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26057:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
12,716 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:39687f0dbcf89e00e4c3cfda22fa
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.6 tons/acre

Gratiot County · 2022

How calculated

Gratiot County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26057:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:391be3f99587e3ff161ed1b642c6
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
1,650 head

Gratiot County · 2022

How calculated

Gratiot County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26057:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,650 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e7426a3003ecb92b877f839588bc
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
59,950 head

Gratiot County · 2022

How calculated

Gratiot County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26057:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
59,950 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e148431b300b1166283cab2e9ff0
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
31,194 head

Gratiot County · 2022

How calculated

Gratiot County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26057:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
31,194 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c3dcf97acc6d0ef140d5b36e09a8
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
362 head

Gratiot County · 2022

How calculated

Gratiot County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26057:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
362 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1107807be3dedb133798ab4d1a14
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Gratiot County · 2022

How calculated

Gratiot County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26057:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7664994889f707be411c966af064
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation34.5 in
How calculated

ALMA, MI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:150e7e8bf887aac0881d30da4ddd
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature47 °F
How calculated

ALMA, MI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:038bc709dbb649b6ebebbf07bc60
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance8.8 miles
How calculated

ALMA, MI US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Breckenridge reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e94965fafcfc1097ffe9456f9666
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
13.9 percent

Breckenridge · 2026

How calculated

Breckenridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3ae483649ff7a75a5eab3147054d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Breckenridge · 2026

How calculated

Breckenridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:92e07ff3fb05d1d3bbc6b1d10781
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Breckenridge · 2026

How calculated

Breckenridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:422f8f1ed3b0f4aac9a7ec1547ff
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Breckenridge · 2026

How calculated

Breckenridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ac8db0af7071c227f0efb5908356
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
22.8 0-100

Breckenridge · 2026

How calculated

Breckenridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d5bb716d152d8234dc2fbc1196f1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Breckenridge · 2026

How calculated

Breckenridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:679020eaa606c367d8a1621e9fbf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
17 weeks

Breckenridge · 2026

How calculated

Breckenridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cb3d6524040e4bb3022b7a73da4a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Breckenridge · 2026

How calculated

Breckenridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cef0c4cf276ba14ca3c7a06b7a90
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
15.6 0-100

Breckenridge · 2026

How calculated

Breckenridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:10c8da7b24cadbc4a72222c65a0a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
12.3 0-100

Breckenridge · 2026

How calculated

Breckenridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5b396f1167bc765b47f42296ec1d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
29.6 percent

Breckenridge · 2026

How calculated

Breckenridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:941bf2f0bd358d9be7d0ce029302
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
7.7 percent

Breckenridge · 2026

How calculated

Breckenridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e46c7962b5fc2bb942c20d534e00
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

38.8sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Breckenridge?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 72 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.