HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Bridgton, Maine

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Bridgton.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint30 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth53.2 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence76.1 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty54.9 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal50.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Bridgton
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Bridgton. The latest 2025 raster shows 30 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 28th percentile among 155 analyzed Maine localities and the 23rd percentile nationally. Cumberland County reports 453 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Somersworth, New Hampshire, 58 miles away with 1,076 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 31.6% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 28th percentile among analyzed Maine localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles30mapped acres · 0.002% of radius · 2025

28th percentile among 155 analyzed Maine localities · 23th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Bridgton · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
135
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
135 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:552776c88ad72e4d3891c1f64b7d
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

76.1 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 232 acres · 20th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2009: 55 acres · 18th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2010: 245 acres · 46th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2011: 106 acres · 59th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 10th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2013: 119 acres · 54th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2014: 214 acres · 44th regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2015: 154 acres · 45th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2016: 55 acres · 14th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2017: 95 acres · 25th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2018: 97 acres · 21st regional percentile · 27th national percentile2019: 105 acres · 14th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2020: 78 acres · 17th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2021: 99 acres · 20th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2022: 56 acres · 21st regional percentile · 24th national percentile2023: 35 acres · 10th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2024: 34 acres · 29th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2025: 30 acres · 28th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

53.2production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
453 acres

Cumberland County · 2022

How calculated

Cumberland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
23005:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
453 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e181f08f9c226e1ad508258ba1fd
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
17 farms

Cumberland County · 2022

How calculated

Cumberland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
23005:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
17 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:62012ee3c363f971754f0a04d47e
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Cumberland County · 2022

How calculated

Cumberland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
23005:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bb66fcd396c3cf7207184f2e779f
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Cumberland County · 2022

How calculated

Cumberland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
23005:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7c3fd0e96f883a075438d2d486ab
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
493 tons

Cumberland County · 2022

How calculated

Cumberland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
23005:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
493 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e45d97ceba14baaf2dec3ec6b1f5
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.1 tons/acre

Cumberland County · 2022

How calculated

Cumberland County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
23005:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:84f19f08c40eeffa74bdf2011cb7
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
1,418 head

Cumberland County · 2022

How calculated

Cumberland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
23005:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,418 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0fe453706211970359bd6e84febe
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
5,134 head

Cumberland County · 2022

How calculated

Cumberland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
23005:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,134 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:76ade631d3f42eeaff678523cc55
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
1,243 head

Cumberland County · 2022

How calculated

Cumberland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
23005:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,243 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2a3e68bfb801ded1032208703ddf
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
715 head

Cumberland County · 2022

How calculated

Cumberland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
23005:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
715 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:80a3eb439b640b09e8d0df9c2799
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Cumberland County · 2022

How calculated

Cumberland County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
23005:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2a8acb026cfb6521a50bf5a02e26
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Cumberland County · 2022

How calculated

Cumberland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
23005:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c3697a3c3f855992328664739b8a
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation50.6 in
How calculated

BRIDGTON 3 NW, ME US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a16c515630a8055cf017ccd84927
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature43.8 °F
How calculated

BRIDGTON 3 NW, ME US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cc6cc3c16799b6d01bef04f03ca3
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance1.6 miles
How calculated

BRIDGTON 3 NW, ME US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Bridgton reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3ee627b564df65ea503d539e453e
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
68.9 percent

Bridgton · 2026

How calculated

Bridgton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6abfc2cb233822dc
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2d5ea7b48dce81ed46a0ca08b63e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
31.6 percent

Bridgton · 2026

How calculated

Bridgton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6abfc2cb233822dc
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ed259050eb0e6a847f96c371cdae
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Bridgton · 2026

How calculated

Bridgton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6abfc2cb233822dc
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a017ca11a5f7d2e2154b44d7b1de
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Bridgton · 2026

How calculated

Bridgton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6abfc2cb233822dc
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:527b82cf73f12a5f54a4718851d9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
40.1 0-100

Bridgton · 2026

How calculated

Bridgton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6abfc2cb233822dc
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:402797a3bf13002075da5bd72aff
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Bridgton · 2026

How calculated

Bridgton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6abfc2cb233822dc
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:794fad597f0b629c6212eafd94ae
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
39 weeks

Bridgton · 2026

How calculated

Bridgton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6abfc2cb233822dc
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6970d092a665852b1144f57dfc76
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
28.8 0-100

Bridgton · 2026

How calculated

Bridgton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6abfc2cb233822dc
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e34af725ed79ee7cfd62a2565750
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
65.6 0-100

Bridgton · 2026

How calculated

Bridgton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6abfc2cb233822dc
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:eb7537ff755d9518bb167e88787e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
29.8 0-100

Bridgton · 2026

How calculated

Bridgton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6abfc2cb233822dc
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0589561c30cc5a70a22cf720baee
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
84 percent

Bridgton · 2026

How calculated

Bridgton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6abfc2cb233822dc
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ac45db71cd21b3c078f21f12fa1f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
70.4 percent

Bridgton · 2026

How calculated

Bridgton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6abfc2cb233822dc
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:38bf33af10bae90b3466c4d389ac
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

54.9sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Somersworth, New Hampshire57.5 mi1,076 ac97.12. Alfalfa Hay in Berwick, Maine56.2 mi1,048 ac95.33. Alfalfa Hay in Rochester, New Hampshire55.3 mi1,009 ac92.64. Alfalfa Hay in North Berwick, Maine53.9 mi923 ac86.65. Alfalfa Hay in Farmington, Maine49.7 mi713 ac72.26. Alfalfa Hay in Milton, New Hampshire48.5 mi674 ac69.57. Alfalfa Hay in Farmington, New Hampshire50.1 mi649 ac67.78. Alfalfa Hay in Wilton, Maine42.9 mi611 ac65.49. Alfalfa Hay in Chisholm, Maine38.7 mi501 ac5810. Alfalfa Hay in Winthrop, Maine41.5 mi502 ac57.9
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Bridgton?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Cumberland Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Bridgton

Barley Hay in Bridgton, MaineContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Bridgton, MaineContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Bridgton, MaineContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Bridgton, MaineContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Bridgton, MaineContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Bridgton, MaineContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 72 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.