Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in St. Marks, Kansas

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving St. Marks.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint17,629 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth84.4 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence92.1 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty39.2 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal34.4 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around St. Marks. The latest 2025 raster shows 17,629 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 76th percentile among 740 analyzed Kansas localities and the 84th percentile nationally. Sedgwick County reports 10,405 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Sylvia, Kansas, 49 miles away with 44,229 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 67.6% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 76th percentile among analyzed Kansas localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

92.1 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 18,003 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 81st national percentile2009: 16,000 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 81st national percentile2010: 25,411 acres · 81st regional percentile · 85th national percentile2011: 16,898 acres · 76th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2012: 22,745 acres · 79th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2013: 18,373 acres · 76th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2014: 10,358 acres · 68th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2015: 17,041 acres · 74th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2016: 20,821 acres · 80th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2017: 18,307 acres · 77th regional percentile · 78th national percentile2018: 18,943 acres · 76th regional percentile · 78th national percentile2019: 23,202 acres · 78th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2020: 23,261 acres · 78th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2021: 24,667 acres · 78th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2022: 24,914 acres · 79th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2023: 23,784 acres · 78th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2024: 10,280 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 79th national percentile2025: 17,629 acres · 76th regional percentile · 84th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

84.4production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
10,405 acres

Sedgwick County · 2022

How calculated

Sedgwick County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20173:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10,405 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7ddabffb35bd1f8b48a4ce8ac538
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
181 farms

Sedgwick County · 2022

How calculated

Sedgwick County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20173:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
181 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:37ddc0984475e2dd23f9700eb7bb
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
688 acres

Sedgwick County · 2022

How calculated

Sedgwick County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20173:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
688 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bdcaad5d4ed8dc3400c094ba10f5
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
21 farms

Sedgwick County · 2022

How calculated

Sedgwick County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20173:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
21 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ccf9fac986cd24c5a0b63b46e4ac
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
6.6 percent

Sedgwick County · 2022

How calculated

Sedgwick County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20173:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:542b3d0447f70d0f25f69d3bff6a
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
33,092 tons

Sedgwick County · 2022

How calculated

Sedgwick County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20173:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
33,092 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a6498b03fea63a72f713a08fdc7c
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3.2 tons/acre

Sedgwick County · 2022

How calculated

Sedgwick County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20173:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f7ba830f5c0afca7f6c15ab80171
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
14,061 head

Sedgwick County · 2022

How calculated

Sedgwick County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20173:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14,061 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2092a7ed4a0f025e79670e54d982
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
33,497 head

Sedgwick County · 2022

How calculated

Sedgwick County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20173:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
33,497 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1b1458937c29e4fbd766d0e89d4a
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
1,246 head

Sedgwick County · 2022

How calculated

Sedgwick County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20173:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,246 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0ef373a944a59a1a974b67f2dabf
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,139 head

Sedgwick County · 2022

How calculated

Sedgwick County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20173:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,139 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9e000bb05b950505c4119cf223fa
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Sedgwick County · 2022

How calculated

Sedgwick County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20173:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:652cc40ae932580abed5059062b2
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation34.4 in
How calculated

WICHITA WX, KS US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a444ea8c00000a804e094adbd7be
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature57.1 °F
How calculated

WICHITA WX, KS US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c5e2d3fcb57dcc09a6cecc541803
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance8.6 miles
How calculated

WICHITA WX, KS US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from St. Marks reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ed911395541029070483152fc3eb
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

St. Marks · 2026

How calculated

St. Marks · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4829f3b7a25a54e6cafc6e880b21
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
67.6 percent

St. Marks · 2026

How calculated

St. Marks · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3589ac486c484cb1b2d4291b2b49
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

St. Marks · 2026

How calculated

St. Marks · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7e0f68193a58e0a4ce8c0db8e794
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

St. Marks · 2026

How calculated

St. Marks · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c9cceba6319ba6430afc4dfc24c5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
53.5 0-100

St. Marks · 2026

How calculated

St. Marks · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d2120f5ff94fc404b8e3409b02a0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

St. Marks · 2026

How calculated

St. Marks · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dbbcb413e298c345fdd84fb1ec0a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
3 weeks

St. Marks · 2026

How calculated

St. Marks · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1326157553d3dd86fbc38f1c1171
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
14.6 0-100

St. Marks · 2026

How calculated

St. Marks · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:062e7849464e1accb4ca26262758
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

St. Marks · 2026

How calculated

St. Marks · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:79a4a816da5f7f71b00542f111de
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

St. Marks · 2026

How calculated

St. Marks · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:124bed3b41e678583c338037b930
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
7.9 percent

St. Marks · 2026

How calculated

St. Marks · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9f8afe9de318cadee556bd8148d2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
1.8 percent

St. Marks · 2026

How calculated

St. Marks · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4ae62768cb0e66f074edd2b2cfd9
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

39.2sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in St. Marks?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.