Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Clayton, Kansas

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Clayton.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint12,617.1 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth80.7 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence96 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty42.4 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal26.2 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Clayton. The latest 2025 raster shows 12,617 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 67th percentile among 740 analyzed Kansas localities and the 78th percentile nationally. Norton County reports 5,803 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Eustis, Nebraska, 65 miles away with 32,352 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 42.5% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 67th percentile among analyzed Kansas localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

96 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 16,158 acres · 69th regional percentile · 79th national percentile2009: 14,520 acres · 69th regional percentile · 79th national percentile2010: 13,563 acres · 60th regional percentile · 75th national percentile2011: 12,538 acres · 65th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2012: 12,179 acres · 61st regional percentile · 74th national percentile2013: 12,678 acres · 64th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2014: 11,131 acres · 71st regional percentile · 71st national percentile2015: 13,883 acres · 68th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2016: 14,298 acres · 66th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2017: 13,963 acres · 68th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2018: 15,082 acres · 68th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2019: 15,676 acres · 64th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2020: 15,843 acres · 64th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2021: 14,987 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 74th national percentile2022: 14,904 acres · 64th regional percentile · 75th national percentile2023: 14,508 acres · 64th regional percentile · 75th national percentile2024: 10,443 acres · 74th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2025: 12,617 acres · 67th regional percentile · 78th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

80.7production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
5,803 acres

Norton County · 2022

How calculated

Norton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20137:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,803 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:880a9aed6b4dce181dd32c8dfd1e
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
66 farms

Norton County · 2022

How calculated

Norton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20137:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
66 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c0e27dabd89b303065d904aa4ac9
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
721 acres

Norton County · 2022

How calculated

Norton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20137:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
721 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:89a61031665af4ba262b7d040565
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
15 farms

Norton County · 2022

How calculated

Norton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20137:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
15 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0f521c06c401ee0d60185c55dc7b
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
12.4 percent

Norton County · 2022

How calculated

Norton County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20137:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:479b697973dc21badd4e98326e63
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
17,164 tons

Norton County · 2022

How calculated

Norton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20137:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
17,164 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:16f221a740ea856a67da317c4632
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3 tons/acre

Norton County · 2022

How calculated

Norton County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20137:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fed38084efdd4383a806493450b8
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
15,804 head

Norton County · 2022

How calculated

Norton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20137:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
15,804 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c6b75f0312fcd6d4df5600898edc
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
41,350 head

Norton County · 2022

How calculated

Norton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20137:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
41,350 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2407bcce8d575f2f163955161174
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Norton County · 2022

How calculated

Norton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20137:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4d1e0212cff838c80b011687b1ba
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
295 head

Norton County · 2022

How calculated

Norton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20137:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
295 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ae5d1c0bf30fd3cd68b9b5453b11
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.3 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Norton County · 2022

How calculated

Norton County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20137:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5a063658907158daabc9e0545b03
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation26.2 in
How calculated

NORTON DAM, KS US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:862083006afb5aeb4e33bd27c7bf
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature51.6 °F
How calculated

NORTON DAM, KS US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:825f5142e30ddd7cc8135f0be3f0
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance13.6 miles
How calculated

NORTON DAM, KS US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Clayton reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:802a4cb8b483e5c3de36d1512fbb
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
73.6 percent

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d67d1d0191ebf0495258676ae95f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
42.5 percent

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dd807171a6320d8030aeb9ce7f5a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:27292426b1dbb110ce71e21c6397
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0724759ca9122f922919ded43afd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
43.2 0-100

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9a0239d234472f4031d6d6c3b202
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3ff48e7fb95c4a501760abde5baa
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
25 weeks

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cd1f751ee599bdc0feffd5f3bed6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
53 0-100

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9d068a7a297508a12933e934ea2e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
23.2 0-100

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c2756aa8d55665b2ca98e765adc9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
41.1 0-100

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:29fbdf706bba2bea029ec96eb577
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
39.8 percent

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c3323eeb1791d04c177f639adf30
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
23.2 percent

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:38156d07c49f3b4b8c4d357aabc8
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

42.4sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Clayton?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 101 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.