Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Thayer, Iowa

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Thayer.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint35,319.6 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth92.8 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence87.1 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty33.8 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal38 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Thayer. The latest 2025 raster shows 35,320 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 94th percentile among 1,026 analyzed Iowa localities and the 95th percentile nationally. Union County reports 12,617 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Afton, Iowa, 7.6 miles away with 35,113 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

Thayer ranks among the strongest persistent mapped alfalfa footprints in Iowa.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2008-30m
  • usda-cdl-2009-30m
  • usda-cdl-2010-30m
  • usda-cdl-2011-30m
  • usda-cdl-2012-30m
  • usda-cdl-2013-30m
  • usda-cdl-2014-30m
  • usda-cdl-2015-30m
  • usda-cdl-2016-30m
  • usda-cdl-2017-30m
  • usda-cdl-2018-30m
  • usda-cdl-2019-30m
  • usda-cdl-2020-30m
  • usda-cdl-2021-30m
  • usda-cdl-2022-30m
  • usda-cdl-2023-30m
  • usda-cdl-2024-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

87.1 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 22,435 acres · 95th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2009: 9,471 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 72nd national percentile2010: 12,025 acres · 81st regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2011: 32,864 acres · 88th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2012: 30,093 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 87th national percentile2013: 34,957 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 91st national percentile2014: 44,834 acres · 97th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2015: 47,594 acres · 97th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2016: 54,935 acres · 99th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2017: 44,845 acres · 97th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2018: 42,933 acres · 98th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2019: 31,688 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 87th national percentile2020: 29,432 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 85th national percentile2021: 24,719 acres · 91st regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2022: 24,737 acres · 91st regional percentile · 84th national percentile2023: 24,456 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 85th national percentile2024: 24,117 acres · 91st regional percentile · 91st national percentile2025: 35,320 acres · 94th regional percentile · 95th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

92.8production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
12,617 acres

Union County · 2022

How calculated

Union County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19175:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
12,617 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4bf27a5f943cab36ba25fe31b78d
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
190 farms

Union County · 2022

How calculated

Union County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19175:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
190 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c84bbcfd591757f5b06d1399fce3
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Union County · 2022

How calculated

Union County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19175:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:933415fc0a574552045c8ca0db44
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Union County · 2022

How calculated

Union County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19175:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:417f13d8e580629ad0b4b4fe580a
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
33,844 tons

Union County · 2022

How calculated

Union County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19175:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
33,844 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:884e5b4ba69160c5f695039b70a8
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.7 tons/acre

Union County · 2022

How calculated

Union County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19175:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e76be395660cbbf4c5db56e4f860
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Union County · 2022

How calculated

Union County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19175:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:eb8674d70e26af98172edb18ed0b
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
28,446 head

Union County · 2022

How calculated

Union County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19175:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
28,446 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5142ec87725603b1724e3e73780b
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Union County · 2022

How calculated

Union County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19175:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:80a6b49fcdbd8661448d0befd880
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
582 head

Union County · 2022

How calculated

Union County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19175:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
582 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b58f77faecff0cd6f42a9a33fa43
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Union County · 2022

How calculated

Union County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19175:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b7f04a0768d42641a0aeb5efb4a9
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
645 head

Union County · 2022

How calculated

Union County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19175:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
645 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1a02987f9eef3ff0faf2528655a0
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation38 in
How calculated

BEACONSFIELD, IA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5b55658efeaf2fa76bdd1291ee4c
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature49.2 °F
How calculated

BEACONSFIELD, IA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:96f141999252b42dc1456a9da98a
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance15.3 miles
How calculated

BEACONSFIELD, IA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Thayer reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1cd4695fb48642ea4a0383577e09
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Thayer · 2026

How calculated

Thayer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:61ee7f63f0563d2ce2984a822978
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Thayer · 2026

How calculated

Thayer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2cd08c5146493a5af43ff64aed4b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Thayer · 2026

How calculated

Thayer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c888c2531747c1d37f3cfe92fc51
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Thayer · 2026

How calculated

Thayer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cfcadac4b0715a023c837542795c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Thayer · 2026

How calculated

Thayer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:90746a79ce82f00e6d204fc0cc72
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Thayer · 2026

How calculated

Thayer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7879bf072e3556406df0ca25ba4a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
0 weeks

Thayer · 2026

How calculated

Thayer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:91b06225c3f71a8ad30b1412a37a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Thayer · 2026

How calculated

Thayer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2f1bb505bd7c98d7c339c74a41d8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
22.7 0-100

Thayer · 2026

How calculated

Thayer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:309cc13bb335cd4ca50fb66511ff
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
2.3 0-100

Thayer · 2026

How calculated

Thayer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7f39a7c53bf78a111df29bd35db5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
1.3 percent

Thayer · 2026

How calculated

Thayer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:93ff29bbbf5c7951abb105ec9d1d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Thayer · 2026

How calculated

Thayer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5b77a482927c1091a99b803e9e0f
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

33.8sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Thayer?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 70 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.