Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Marquette, Iowa

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Marquette.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint46,676.7 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth96.5 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence94 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty34.4 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal37.7 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Marquette. The latest 2025 raster shows 46,677 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 97th percentile among 1,026 analyzed Iowa localities and the 97th percentile nationally. Clayton County reports 23,009 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Rewey, Wisconsin, 43 miles away with 82,242 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

Marquette ranks among the strongest persistent mapped alfalfa footprints in Iowa.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2008-30m
  • usda-cdl-2009-30m
  • usda-cdl-2010-30m
  • usda-cdl-2011-30m
  • usda-cdl-2012-30m
  • usda-cdl-2013-30m
  • usda-cdl-2014-30m
  • usda-cdl-2015-30m
  • usda-cdl-2016-30m
  • usda-cdl-2017-30m
  • usda-cdl-2018-30m
  • usda-cdl-2019-30m
  • usda-cdl-2020-30m
  • usda-cdl-2021-30m
  • usda-cdl-2022-30m
  • usda-cdl-2023-30m
  • usda-cdl-2024-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

94 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 29,261 acres · 98th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2009: 30,572 acres · 98th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2010: 44,277 acres · 99th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2011: 56,204 acres · 96th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2012: 35,475 acres · 95th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2013: 39,758 acres · 96th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2014: 42,587 acres · 95th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2015: 46,773 acres · 97th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2016: 51,069 acres · 97th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2017: 46,705 acres · 98th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2018: 44,169 acres · 98th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2019: 49,345 acres · 99th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2020: 46,377 acres · 98th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2021: 43,584 acres · 97th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2022: 35,572 acres · 96th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2023: 33,241 acres · 97th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2024: 36,185 acres · 96th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2025: 46,677 acres · 97th regional percentile · 97th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

96.5production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
23,009 acres

Clayton County · 2022

How calculated

Clayton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19043:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
23,009 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:518bdce0a1c930b96e21daaafe44
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
529 farms

Clayton County · 2022

How calculated

Clayton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19043:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
529 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5b5d254db3474c4230a6335a05e9
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Clayton County · 2022

How calculated

Clayton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19043:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:33eeeb684481030fdb0fc8e59e6f
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
2 farms

Clayton County · 2022

How calculated

Clayton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19043:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b83def1d58162833a747374fac55
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
89,230 tons

Clayton County · 2022

How calculated

Clayton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19043:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
89,230 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6de0a19dabacdaa67f0967b33d11
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3.9 tons/acre

Clayton County · 2022

How calculated

Clayton County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19043:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bd8fa42ad0e7769ed206be72c7f6
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
15,800 head

Clayton County · 2022

How calculated

Clayton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19043:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
15,800 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:66d454c5ba08782366b953094dbe
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
69,297 head

Clayton County · 2022

How calculated

Clayton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19043:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
69,297 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4532c8c6126d5782711e0ee51268
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
10,160 head

Clayton County · 2022

How calculated

Clayton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19043:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10,160 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:74d071982a4cbb387e923ab97050
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
855 head

Clayton County · 2022

How calculated

Clayton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19043:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
855 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5a3a2e83475a054444f4cefe2f96
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Clayton County · 2022

How calculated

Clayton County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19043:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0f5c1310a4572e9d4c2298c056ab
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
495 head

Clayton County · 2022

How calculated

Clayton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19043:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
495 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4385cd8704037eb64c3ae85fe144
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation37.7 in
How calculated

PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, WI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:eb15b26b3e58b63597b5725a81a1
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature47.7 °F
How calculated

PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, WI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7cb27ec651b3ff97831ed88db264
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance3 miles
How calculated

PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, WI US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Marquette reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1eb10f6bf8b3de210b5e75c5327f
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Marquette · 2026

How calculated

Marquette · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d8f43c5c333dabc0c3c3d84d1a32
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Marquette · 2026

How calculated

Marquette · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bfdd72710df7091aa7589b475d0e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Marquette · 2026

How calculated

Marquette · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b2619fa2468b0579b29c7713fe8f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Marquette · 2026

How calculated

Marquette · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5011ef514aabb4fa33c19f3719fc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Marquette · 2026

How calculated

Marquette · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:132862c1096627dd5331cb45ad13
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Marquette · 2026

How calculated

Marquette · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f46d9e1a336b80f89ba911f4d3c4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
0 weeks

Marquette · 2026

How calculated

Marquette · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:33f6306c8084174bd28888af2fc8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Marquette · 2026

How calculated

Marquette · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2af4e2dd99b2583b9796c3c73e02
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
17.1 0-100

Marquette · 2026

How calculated

Marquette · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8a643c8759f75d6a92410459cb1d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Marquette · 2026

How calculated

Marquette · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:344498986f80fc0e5a0236b25ece
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
3.1 percent

Marquette · 2026

How calculated

Marquette · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cda2df8914273ee87435d592a69b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Marquette · 2026

How calculated

Marquette · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cd3f6dfbf339a9312b96af9826cf
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

34.4sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Marquette?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 70 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.