Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Lakota, Iowa

Name: Alfalfa market intelligence for Lakota, Iowa
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Lakota.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Lakota

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT

Local mapped footprint4,296.2 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth41.7 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence87.3 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty59.1 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal32.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Lakota

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Lakota. The latest 2025 raster shows 4,296 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 1st percentile among 1,026 analyzed Iowa localities and the 59th percentile nationally. Kossuth County reports 1,353 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Glenville, Minnesota, 43 miles away with 9,546 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 93.6% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplyMODERATE

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureLOW

MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 1st percentile among analyzed Iowa localities.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

5 mi

101 ac

10 mi

388 ac

25 mi

4,296 ac

50 mi

21,199 ac

100 mi

160,174 ac

150 mi

693,357 ac

250 mi

2,395,138 ac

Within 25 miles4,296mapped acres · 0.342% of radius · 2025

1th percentile among 1,026 analyzed Iowa localities · 59th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Lakota · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 19318
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 19318 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:fadd26f2c9629792a7ad54e8afc5
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

87.3 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

41.7production depth

Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL

1,353 acres

Kossuth County · 2022

How calculated

Kossuth County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 19109:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 1,353 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:9ee6af77f92a08aead18f3a428b3
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL

95 farms

Kossuth County · 2022

How calculated

Kossuth County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 19109:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 95 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:8dfa2b0870dfc62d751bc9bc788d
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

- acres

Kossuth County · 2022

How calculated

Kossuth County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 19109:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: - acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:5f93f5e6c268ae97ac4ad0f0d232
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

- farms

Kossuth County · 2022

How calculated

Kossuth County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 19109:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: - farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:c0e64a0cf729dc28073aa43266c6
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL

5,056 tons

Kossuth County · 2022

How calculated

Kossuth County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 19109:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 5,056 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:17ef9bf948b2497622686cb36527
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL

3.7 tons/acre

Kossuth County · 2022

How calculated

Kossuth County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 19109:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: tons/acre
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:460923bda59458cbeb48811dfda0
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

(D) head

Kossuth County · 2022

How calculated

Kossuth County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 19109:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: (D) head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:291acf52dd25e622588a9fef7617
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

21,456 head

Kossuth County · 2022

How calculated

Kossuth County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 19109:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 21,456 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:6080916fdaa846f61f289da3de9c
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

(D) head

Kossuth County · 2022

How calculated

Kossuth County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 19109:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: (D) head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:797ca4af546f47014b697e714554
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

116 head

Kossuth County · 2022

How calculated

Kossuth County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 19109:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 116 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:a559de4c81bd48b6f784e05379fa
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

0.1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Kossuth County · 2022

How calculated

Kossuth County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 19109:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:208b636000f4b17cd19c73b9acce
Official record: Open source ↗

GoatsHISTORICAL

1,325 head

Kossuth County · 2022

How calculated

Kossuth County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 19109:goats:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 1,325 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:ab6a13ef4497aedc22a218764ae8
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation32.9 in

How calculated

SWEA CITY 5N, IA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:7c93a17bb43025f54bf03670817d
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature43.8 °F

How calculated

SWEA CITY 5N, IA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:baa6bc4eb428dc62bface34d8f76
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance11.8 miles

How calculated

SWEA CITY 5N, IA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Lakota reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:7042d929ee2eab4f5723e33bfb2b
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

93.6 percent

Lakota · 2026

How calculated

Lakota · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:56b2d1ebff5d349767b14b2d01bb
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Lakota · 2026

How calculated

Lakota · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:9dc5997b4fc233f499fd98f6add6
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Lakota · 2026

How calculated

Lakota · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:1a4f48818010ae39cb2d2bf6500c
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D1 category

Lakota · 2026

How calculated

Lakota · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:f632aea34c8dd9e82bb6fbb9bc0e
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

38.7 0-100

Lakota · 2026

How calculated

Lakota · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:8fc14a1777c6d5a03a2d6ccf2dcc
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

STABLE category

Lakota · 2026

How calculated

Lakota · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:3e9182c4ddc52417b066737e5e10
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

12 weeks

Lakota · 2026

How calculated

Lakota · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:0471da96735948a27f5da2da4d22
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

20 0-100

Lakota · 2026

How calculated

Lakota · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:bfcf1e7dcdbf380a6a11c7bbc56b
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

38.2 0-100

Lakota · 2026

How calculated

Lakota · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:c02c045983d8b17249d7675d6298
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

38.7 0-100

Lakota · 2026

How calculated

Lakota · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:3f386ce8b9133592d99c86783166
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

26.6 percent

Lakota · 2026

How calculated

Lakota · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:b722cfae17ae55ed315caa094089
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Lakota · 2026

How calculated

Lakota · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:3105653f3d40fadaaf661dae8f62
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

59.1sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Alfalfa Hay in Glenville, Minnesota43 mi9,546 ac97.8 2. Alfalfa Hay in Albert Lea, Minnesota41.3 mi9,314 ac96.1 3. Alfalfa Hay in Manchester, Minnesota40.2 mi8,611 ac90.6 4. Alfalfa Hay in Twin Lakes, Minnesota36 mi8,485 ac89.9 5. Alfalfa Hay in Hartland, Minnesota42.5 mi8,407 ac88.9 6. Alfalfa Hay in Hanlontown, Iowa36.7 mi8,120 ac87 7. Alfalfa Hay in Emmons, Minnesota32 mi8,007 ac86.3 8. Alfalfa Hay in Freeborn, Minnesota37.8 mi7,851 ac84.8 9. Alfalfa Hay in Lake Mills, Iowa28.5 mi7,651 ac83.7 10. Alfalfa Hay in Fertile, Iowa34.8 mi7,628 ac83.2

Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Lakota?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Kossuth Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Lakota

Barley Hay in Lakota, IowaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Lakota, IowaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Lakota, IowaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Lakota, IowaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Lakota, IowaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Lakota, IowaContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 70 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Alfalfa Hayin Lakota, Iowa

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local alfalfa footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Alfalfa Hay in Lakota?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Lakota

Methodology & sources

Alfalfa Hay
in Lakota, Iowa