Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Granger, Indiana

Name: Alfalfa market intelligence for Granger, Indiana
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Granger.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Granger

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT

Local mapped footprint23,115.3 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth91.8 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence91.1 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty35.9 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal40.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Granger

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Granger. The latest 2025 raster shows 23,115 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 90th percentile among 974 analyzed Indiana localities and the 89th percentile nationally. St. Joseph County reports 3,721 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Shipshewana Lake, Indiana, 27 miles away with 35,687 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplySTRONG

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureLOW

MarketplaceLIMITED

Granger ranks among the strongest persistent mapped alfalfa footprints in Indiana.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m
usda-cdl-2008-30m
usda-cdl-2009-30m
usda-cdl-2010-30m
usda-cdl-2011-30m
usda-cdl-2012-30m
usda-cdl-2013-30m
usda-cdl-2014-30m
usda-cdl-2015-30m
usda-cdl-2016-30m
usda-cdl-2017-30m
usda-cdl-2018-30m
usda-cdl-2019-30m
usda-cdl-2020-30m
usda-cdl-2021-30m
usda-cdl-2022-30m
usda-cdl-2023-30m
usda-cdl-2024-30m
usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

5 mi

254 ac

10 mi

1,579 ac

25 mi

23,115 ac

50 mi

83,415 ac

100 mi

241,886 ac

150 mi

544,739 ac

250 mi

1,717,466 ac

Within 25 miles23,115mapped acres · 1.839% of radius · 2025

90th percentile among 974 analyzed Indiana localities · 89th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Granger · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 103938
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 103938 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:032d464cbbe3cc756ba1979a3882
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

91.1 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

91.8production depth

Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL

3,721 acres

St. Joseph County · 2022

How calculated

St. Joseph County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 18141:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 3,721 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:d6704353d8423a308f30a584d199
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL

129 farms

St. Joseph County · 2022

How calculated

St. Joseph County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 18141:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 129 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:a0d9b8fa231f2ed612d92499b591
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

259 acres

St. Joseph County · 2022

How calculated

St. Joseph County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 18141:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 259 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:21bdc46c6f359212523b49a1844f
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

10 farms

St. Joseph County · 2022

How calculated

St. Joseph County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 18141:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 10 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:977392ebad6e5d5f168b74715c57
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL

7 percent

St. Joseph County · 2022

How calculated

St. Joseph County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 18141:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:414c00c3e93b73e2ddb90cff0171
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL

9,479 tons

St. Joseph County · 2022

How calculated

St. Joseph County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 18141:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 9,479 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:739339a81607ba84b97015f75700
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL

2.5 tons/acre

St. Joseph County · 2022

How calculated

St. Joseph County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 18141:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: tons/acre
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:8a541619a3dc245845ce095fdd7f
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

1,058 head

St. Joseph County · 2022

How calculated

St. Joseph County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 18141:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 1,058 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:acdd5abaa18fd5dc679e0b7e58c9
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

4,513 head

St. Joseph County · 2022

How calculated

St. Joseph County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 18141:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 4,513 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:9205a159a8ca5cd793f28dfdb9e1
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

1,596 head

St. Joseph County · 2022

How calculated

St. Joseph County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 18141:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 1,596 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:22023aab41cf3e0b0bd9cb13bb09
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

944 head

St. Joseph County · 2022

How calculated

St. Joseph County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 18141:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 944 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:7cf547e903d04aca4a84a5bd1e7c
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

St. Joseph County · 2022

How calculated

St. Joseph County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 18141:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:b2defc5fa49bf3d59e6a8721df18
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation40.9 in

How calculated

S BEND, IN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:8c02fd881a4bb02d73b848d18ee9
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature49.8 °F

How calculated

S BEND, IN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:5f916fd54330a32692040726a396
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance6.4 miles

How calculated

S BEND, IN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Granger reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:bf97729a50f56dc8171ab4fe0b9b
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Granger · 2026

How calculated

Granger · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:53f81ce1744070137993761588c9
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Granger · 2026

How calculated

Granger · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:8fb65bee6375e44fbd6eac27d719
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Granger · 2026

How calculated

Granger · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:cab0d5a2a1e35d268e441e0cfe8b
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

NONE category

Granger · 2026

How calculated

Granger · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:75cf9be4d4a4ae319a29acc4012c
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

0 0-100

Granger · 2026

How calculated

Granger · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:e816fef46854eed3139b899090cb
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

STABLE category

Granger · 2026

How calculated

Granger · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:8a8ce20f302aeafb8517a819b788
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

0 weeks

Granger · 2026

How calculated

Granger · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:63d7be3fa58ba43a5b8adae4a471
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

4.4 0-100

Granger · 2026

How calculated

Granger · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:f04c38b74caa24569982550a078d
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

0 0-100

Granger · 2026

How calculated

Granger · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:a6a8cd397fe7fe2a929949706137
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

0 0-100

Granger · 2026

How calculated

Granger · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:9d79f95ce5e8445d2f1c0a849bf9
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

1.4 percent

Granger · 2026

How calculated

Granger · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:376e9ec5848e880fd106c69bc70c
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Granger · 2026

How calculated

Granger · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:e8a9b4c8b3b366dcce9e0de0c7c0
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

35.9sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Alfalfa Hay in Shipshewana Lake, Indiana27.3 mi35,687 ac98.6 2. Alfalfa Hay in Ligonier, Indiana33.7 mi35,513 ac97.9 3. Alfalfa Hay in Shipshewana, Indiana29.1 mi35,227 ac97.6 4. Alfalfa Hay in Topeka, Indiana33.3 mi35,277 ac97.5 5. Alfalfa Hay in Cromwell, Indiana35.5 mi35,144 ac97.1 6. Alfalfa Hay in Middlebury, Indiana22.4 mi34,547 ac96.5 7. Alfalfa Hay in Millersburg, Indiana26.9 mi34,680 ac96.5 8. Alfalfa Hay in Enchanted Hills, Indiana33.1 mi34,688 ac96.2 9. Alfalfa Hay in Scott, Indiana29.7 mi33,946 ac94.9 10. Alfalfa Hay in Vistula, Indiana21.8 mi33,555 ac94.4

Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Granger?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in St. Joseph Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Granger

Barley Hay in Granger, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Granger, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Granger, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Granger, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Granger, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Granger, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 72 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Alfalfa Hayin Granger, Indiana

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local alfalfa footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Alfalfa Hay in Granger?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Granger

Methodology & sources

Alfalfa Hay
in Granger, Indiana