Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Brooklyn, Indiana

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Brooklyn.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint5,660.4 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth60.6 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence89.6 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty50.1 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal45.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Brooklyn. The latest 2025 raster shows 5,660 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 34th percentile among 974 analyzed Indiana localities and the 63rd percentile nationally. Morgan County reports 997 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Ladoga, Indiana, 34 miles away with 9,816 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 34th percentile among analyzed Indiana localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

89.6 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 4,221 acres · 44th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2009: 3,197 acres · 38th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2010: 2,181 acres · 43rd regional percentile · 51st national percentile2011: 2,982 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2012: 3,263 acres · 40th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2013: 1,997 acres · 34th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2014: 3,220 acres · 36th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2015: 2,772 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2016: 3,328 acres · 34th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2017: 3,702 acres · 35th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2018: 4,098 acres · 35th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2019: 4,517 acres · 35th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2020: 5,646 acres · 36th regional percentile · 59th national percentile2021: 4,915 acres · 36th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2022: 4,408 acres · 36th regional percentile · 59th national percentile2023: 4,298 acres · 35th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2024: 1,912 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 59th national percentile2025: 5,660 acres · 34th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

60.6production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
997 acres

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18109:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
997 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:53219bbf18d39f951d935738398e
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
50 farms

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18109:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
50 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0a878afb8e8b0cd1b5ed0c0f0ebd
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18109:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:655c730c56f8020f7ce3db501a87
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18109:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8fad3b460ada6f72f66b1edc48a4
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
2,238 tons

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18109:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,238 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6d6a38fa517926b847b4cf1da703
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.2 tons/acre

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18109:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:60fa696c6c3d935003c2b20b9f06
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
2,001 head

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18109:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,001 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:269b2df4e46a95b1cc9be5739547
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
3,947 head

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18109:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,947 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d86a7fce2b6d4818bb76126ddb78
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
6 head

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18109:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a719efe171041e264a36a66acd48
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
166 head

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18109:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
166 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:52bd9657144c6bf22984bd28690a
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18109:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4b69442898eda1e7c329105cd3d2
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
324 head

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18109:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
324 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:14910c63963377cee437a65cbead
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation45.5 in
How calculated

MARTINSVILLE 2 SW, IN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cb48d05dfd778bcd565fff0378ee
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature51.7 °F
How calculated

MARTINSVILLE 2 SW, IN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2802e5f1ec804c086180c2e68665
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance10.7 miles
How calculated

MARTINSVILLE 2 SW, IN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Brooklyn reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6a916faf8149166a19c5d2c87ebf
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Brooklyn · 2026

How calculated

Brooklyn · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5cbc10f6534aa8369c1426b3a9bb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Brooklyn · 2026

How calculated

Brooklyn · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6e11e5fe2b5a486f7fbdb2e48d68
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Brooklyn · 2026

How calculated

Brooklyn · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3b1e262a2ae517b91d080dea94f4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Brooklyn · 2026

How calculated

Brooklyn · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bad004f6dd65b60e9761197aab3f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Brooklyn · 2026

How calculated

Brooklyn · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:503a681ccd065d6202ff046601e9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Brooklyn · 2026

How calculated

Brooklyn · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b1f9ec723ec35e99054ca76289d1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
4 weeks

Brooklyn · 2026

How calculated

Brooklyn · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f0a664e13155883489abcf41fa8e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Brooklyn · 2026

How calculated

Brooklyn · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9fd133ffe75afedd46035fbb2650
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
13.8 0-100

Brooklyn · 2026

How calculated

Brooklyn · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4095650554bf85a072e8f87520c8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Brooklyn · 2026

How calculated

Brooklyn · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1effd0d88181c4bbfcb8d5fef3b7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
6.5 percent

Brooklyn · 2026

How calculated

Brooklyn · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bfbcf46ebedd40010a4612fe25cf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Brooklyn · 2026

How calculated

Brooklyn · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2a8eb82084c3a2fd9982809fa127
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

50.1sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Brooklyn?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 70 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.