Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Moscow, Idaho

Name: Alfalfa market intelligence for Moscow, Idaho
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Moscow.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Moscow

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT

Local mapped footprint10,449 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth56.5 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence85.2 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty53.8 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal27.8 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Moscow

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Moscow. The latest 2025 raster shows 10,449 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 29th percentile among 236 analyzed Idaho localities and the 74th percentile nationally. Latah County reports 4,997 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Millwood, Washington, 67 miles away with 25,158 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplyMODERATE

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureMODERATE

MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 29th percentile among analyzed Idaho localities.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

5 mi

577 ac

10 mi

2,119 ac

25 mi

10,449 ac

50 mi

38,711 ac

100 mi

164,081 ac

150 mi

445,711 ac

250 mi

967,992 ac

Within 25 miles10,449mapped acres · 0.832% of radius · 2025

29th percentile among 236 analyzed Idaho localities · 74th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Moscow · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 46984
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 46984 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:2a914d545ab1575883f0d5cf02f6
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

85.2 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

56.5production depth

Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL

4,997 acres

Latah County · 2022

How calculated

Latah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 16057:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 4,997 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:11230edf56a3317765bc5141d74d
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL

108 farms

Latah County · 2022

How calculated

Latah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 16057:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 108 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:c36939fc335b6d3cdfc07671d3e6
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

(D) acres

Latah County · 2022

How calculated

Latah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 16057:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: (D) acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:8a2a5c2889f438f572e9bb76550d
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

2 farms

Latah County · 2022

How calculated

Latah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 16057:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 2 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:d0db2f6876ef41998b3e12fb762a
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL

12,684 tons

Latah County · 2022

How calculated

Latah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 16057:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 12,684 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:972d1a2818c932a0ffb1abbfecad
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL

2.5 tons/acre

Latah County · 2022

How calculated

Latah County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 16057:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: tons/acre
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:3589a78d8433eecbd8b6ee9bcdbc
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

2,156 head

Latah County · 2022

How calculated

Latah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 16057:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 2,156 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:2977d2c1e634e01d11ed81c19e2e
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

4,012 head

Latah County · 2022

How calculated

Latah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 16057:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 4,012 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:bf2edd6fa4d532c041d5c55a4b37
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

15 head

Latah County · 2022

How calculated

Latah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 16057:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 15 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:1a4e1ca38c97860c0e68f1a1b2fd
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

641 head

Latah County · 2022

How calculated

Latah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 16057:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 641 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:209fedb30df393560147afbbafe5
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

4.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Latah County · 2022

How calculated

Latah County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 16057:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:b0ed19f5a0bc7f44485440f7fda8
Official record: Open source ↗

GoatsHISTORICAL

373 head

Latah County · 2022

How calculated

Latah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 16057:goats:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 373 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:aff7ab251c7845a2598b00d08cfd
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation27.8 in

How calculated

MOSCOW U OF I, ID US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:076c56778627c42be9f2fb728e5d
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature46.4 °F

How calculated

MOSCOW U OF I, ID US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:19feec0b86f4f4c97b24ec27f5b2
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance2 miles

How calculated

MOSCOW U OF I, ID US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Moscow reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:3cbbfe0d6c72c6bf56ab050fc435
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

100 percent

Moscow · 2026

How calculated

Moscow · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:fb428e474f44e09c5fa536b96d7e
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

100 percent

Moscow · 2026

How calculated

Moscow · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:be7e4e032e6ed00b0153ff593d2c
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

9.4 percent

Moscow · 2026

How calculated

Moscow · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:9ded57aded86fcb5e678bb3e66c8
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D2 category

Moscow · 2026

How calculated

Moscow · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:9a7b7b880a4e60ecb728ee030863
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

61.9 0-100

Moscow · 2026

How calculated

Moscow · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:e17ddb51eb29bd7b573480c261a0
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

STABLE category

Moscow · 2026

How calculated

Moscow · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:54640e37df6c605c14147bbfa7db
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

53 weeks

Moscow · 2026

How calculated

Moscow · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:adf4c73cb1e34337fbf0576bfca4
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

60 0-100

Moscow · 2026

How calculated

Moscow · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:4c42d8f5d3079e13e670327937d7
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

60 0-100

Moscow · 2026

How calculated

Moscow · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:9723f69a2a8c600a5a7b691f7c94
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

60 0-100

Moscow · 2026

How calculated

Moscow · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:c17eafbf3d925c9871753be55d29
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

100 percent

Moscow · 2026

How calculated

Moscow · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:6e756effb58b0732c0a888551853
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

98.3 percent

Moscow · 2026

How calculated

Moscow · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:50f0904176062012af68a1be8faf
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

53.8sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Alfalfa Hay in Millwood, Washington67.3 mi25,158 ac96.6 2. Alfalfa Hay in Four Lakes, Washington63.6 mi25,060 ac96.5 3. Alfalfa Hay in Nezperce, Idaho49.7 mi24,392 ac95.2 4. Alfalfa Hay in Ferdinand, Idaho49.4 mi24,350 ac95.1 5. Alfalfa Hay in Cheney, Washington59.3 mi24,499 ac95.1 6. Alfalfa Hay in Fairchild AFB, Washington68.5 mi24,205 ac93.7 7. Alfalfa Hay in Craigmont, Idaho42.1 mi23,617 ac93.3 8. Alfalfa Hay in Medical Lake, Washington66.5 mi23,877 ac92.9 9. Alfalfa Hay in Spokane, Washington67.8 mi23,871 ac92.8 10. Alfalfa Hay in Airway Heights, Washington68.9 mi23,748 ac92.4

Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Moscow?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Latah Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Moscow

Barley Hay in Moscow, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Moscow, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Moscow, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Moscow, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Moscow, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this locality Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Moscow, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 71 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Alfalfa Hayin Moscow, Idaho

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local alfalfa footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Alfalfa Hay in Moscow?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Moscow

Methodology & sources

Alfalfa Hay
in Moscow, Idaho