Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Canyondam, California

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Canyondam.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint102.5 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth60.2 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence75.4 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty50.9 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal37.1 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Canyondam. The latest 2025 raster shows 103 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 41st percentile among 1,619 analyzed California localities and the 28th percentile nationally. Plumas County reports 10,290 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Janesville, California, 32 miles away with 15,775 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 41st percentile among analyzed California localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

75.4 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 307 acres · 41st regional percentile · 35th national percentile2009: 1,034 acres · 48th regional percentile · 45th national percentile2010: 838 acres · 41st regional percentile · 42nd national percentile2011: 173 acres · 36th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2012: 1,416 acres · 49th regional percentile · 49th national percentile2013: 138 acres · 36th regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2014: 337 acres · 39th regional percentile · 35th national percentile2015: 393 acres · 38th regional percentile · 37th national percentile2016: 317 acres · 37th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2017: 341 acres · 35th regional percentile · 35th national percentile2018: 197 acres · 35th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2019: 606 acres · 39th regional percentile · 37th national percentile2020: 722 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 39th national percentile2021: 456 acres · 36th regional percentile · 38th national percentile2022: 814 acres · 43rd regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2023: 1,029 acres · 43rd regional percentile · 45th national percentile2024: 156 acres · 28th regional percentile · 36th national percentile2025: 103 acres · 41st regional percentile · 28th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

60.2production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
10,290 acres

Plumas County · 2022

How calculated

Plumas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06063:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10,290 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:de69d58f281eb87f59536c618399
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
10 farms

Plumas County · 2022

How calculated

Plumas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06063:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9990ff8ce03bda649fcf03e834d4
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Plumas County · 2022

How calculated

Plumas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06063:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e44d921ad938983163bbd17343b7
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
9 farms

Plumas County · 2022

How calculated

Plumas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06063:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bf5df204e71d8c8e28f30a37b752
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
50,430 tons

Plumas County · 2022

How calculated

Plumas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06063:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
50,430 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:25b856afb5158df400d97e36bad4
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
4.9 tons/acre

Plumas County · 2022

How calculated

Plumas County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06063:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a4c40778e113d3744d1169d048b3
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
4,639 head

Plumas County · 2022

How calculated

Plumas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06063:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,639 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ee25ab3ea2e5c276fedb3ec13463
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
10,235 head

Plumas County · 2022

How calculated

Plumas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06063:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10,235 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ec9a38001820f7bb798b7fc7e109
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Plumas County · 2022

How calculated

Plumas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06063:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:01aa49102cab7a1f972e8a08cf46
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
601 head

Plumas County · 2022

How calculated

Plumas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06063:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
601 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0253398d917f6005e43ee641baf3
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Plumas County · 2022

How calculated

Plumas County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06063:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6b1313cc4524df2aa5e9d8dfd61a
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
84 head

Plumas County · 2022

How calculated

Plumas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06063:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
84 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a3bfa1e0b12f57a04021694785e0
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation37.1 in
How calculated

CANYON DAM, CA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:91126bdf5406b476c7c685ba2260
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature49.1 °F
How calculated

CANYON DAM, CA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2b8930ea22424d36130ba7dd046c
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance0.6 miles
How calculated

CANYON DAM, CA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Canyondam reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:81ea81660ba8fbbb09ac838d3c4f
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
4.7 percent

Canyondam · 2026

How calculated

Canyondam · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:31c16873e25ebe9a28c5221f9bab
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Canyondam · 2026

How calculated

Canyondam · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:28a9e74c1c0c79ddef60ab3e41ee
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Canyondam · 2026

How calculated

Canyondam · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d12e3ff6961aa769fa20c286f642
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Canyondam · 2026

How calculated

Canyondam · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2fc7e6f2318a49ad733c876ab566
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
21 0-100

Canyondam · 2026

How calculated

Canyondam · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d73c502ede902b0f39ca163f1d21
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Canyondam · 2026

How calculated

Canyondam · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7ec4c670d20e023e5465c3d3a58e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
1 weeks

Canyondam · 2026

How calculated

Canyondam · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1011f5a6559066192a3999eae492
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
27.6 0-100

Canyondam · 2026

How calculated

Canyondam · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6a55ea474530e040ab996ab195b6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Canyondam · 2026

How calculated

Canyondam · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2c31ca1e3bfd68afbc8b28c06016
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
20.1 0-100

Canyondam · 2026

How calculated

Canyondam · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0f2612e7231225169c6b8b0affe9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
8.2 percent

Canyondam · 2026

How calculated

Canyondam · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:47feedc092a8923f9afce805c340
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Canyondam · 2026

How calculated

Canyondam · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0c631bb83f6ddacf90d77aad34a9
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

50.9sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Canyondam?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 71 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.