HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Deer, Arkansas

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Deer.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint0.2 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth52.3 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence21.7 / 100LOW
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty56.1 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal56.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Deer
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Deer. The latest 2025 raster shows 0 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 56th percentile among 626 analyzed Arkansas localities and the 16th percentile nationally. Newton County reports 9,270 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Arrow Point, Missouri, 54 miles away with 924 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 60.6% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 56th percentile among analyzed Arkansas localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles0mapped acres · 0% of radius · 2025

56th percentile among 626 analyzed Arkansas localities · 16th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Deer · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
1
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b5503b074872e6e62a19126f4673
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

21.7 / 100 persistence · LOW

2008: 4 acres · 58th regional percentile · 16th national percentile2009: 0 acres · 15th regional percentile · 10th national percentile2010: 0 acres · 66th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 66th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 11th national percentile2013: 0 acres · 54th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2014: 0 acres · 55th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2015: 0 acres · 58th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2016: 0 acres · 59th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2017: 0 acres · 61st regional percentile · 11th national percentile2018: 0 acres · 68th regional percentile · 10th national percentile2019: 0 acres · 58th regional percentile · 8th national percentile2020: 4 acres · 60th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2021: 0 acres · 50th regional percentile · 8th national percentile2022: 0 acres · 47th regional percentile · 8th national percentile2023: 0 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 9th national percentile2024: 0 acres · 48th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2025: 0 acres · 57th regional percentile · 17th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

52.3production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Newton County · 2022

How calculated

Newton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05101:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f40d181327ce2361ce44936cfc63
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Newton County · 2022

How calculated

Newton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05101:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:22f60d60b98c3ef96085aa0d8d0c
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Newton County · 2022

How calculated

Newton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05101:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:93169f9e26bdce728a289dfaf4b9
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Newton County · 2022

How calculated

Newton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05101:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:73ee249e454ef7eb093cc2b1172e
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
- tons

Newton County · 2022

How calculated

Newton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05101:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f546a042ebfdb75c1cd4cf88ed7e
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
9,538 head

Newton County · 2022

How calculated

Newton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05101:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9,538 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:983750eb34f4d7e57961bc66b476
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
14,933 head

Newton County · 2022

How calculated

Newton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05101:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14,933 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1d78e173d2673e89a1af62183bd1
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Newton County · 2022

How calculated

Newton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05101:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c1a601c82f74f63595a217173fdc
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
333 head

Newton County · 2022

How calculated

Newton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05101:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
333 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ef71ff9c6f03ab808ed597781dfa
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.5 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Newton County · 2022

How calculated

Newton County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05101:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e0b3bbfa80423d1029d2a9ab70a1
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
1,157 head

Newton County · 2022

How calculated

Newton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05101:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,157 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f309b7c0549cde5a6e926b758a19
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
9,270 acres

Newton County · 2022

How calculated

Newton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05101:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9,270 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d06a187318d5952f6d430bb1d7d8
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation56.3 in
How calculated

DEER, AR US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:543d40b36594aa64d0617a7b1b12
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature55.2 °F
How calculated

DEER, AR US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2fedbd560d841310a6746180ebb7
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance0.9 miles
How calculated

DEER, AR US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Deer reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fb8edc8100e9c6fca3c7563f1bb4
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
60.6 percent

Deer · 2026

How calculated

Deer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1c96e9a5dd56889d3c686e627eb3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Deer · 2026

How calculated

Deer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:aed3efb0944db4c21e65692cb321
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Deer · 2026

How calculated

Deer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:91f564a1192ed8ba74d408d994ce
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Deer · 2026

How calculated

Deer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:40937d9ec90337f929e6e669a868
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
32.1 0-100

Deer · 2026

How calculated

Deer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2e07b64eea586a3313a67e23d8c6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Deer · 2026

How calculated

Deer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:895acbbdc4f7044ed079cf9c99cf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
29 weeks

Deer · 2026

How calculated

Deer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5e423140d4bac5d16ac882a924b3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
67.7 0-100

Deer · 2026

How calculated

Deer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b92b9d9ba10036c85b6adffdae62
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
60.4 0-100

Deer · 2026

How calculated

Deer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b5b51d80a19eafa190904d08b5e3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Deer · 2026

How calculated

Deer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f18eedef283c7649adaa74185a33
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
55.8 percent

Deer · 2026

How calculated

Deer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:541a005c632de2fdfaa87ae1f229
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
38 percent

Deer · 2026

How calculated

Deer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fb138d0f99449b049f2be1e7535e
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

56.1sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Arrow Point, Missouri54.3 mi924 ac97.32. Alfalfa Hay in Holiday Island, Arkansas53.7 mi737 ac82.13. Alfalfa Hay in Beaver, Arkansas54.4 mi691 ac78.44. Alfalfa Hay in Branson, Missouri54.3 mi642 ac74.45. Alfalfa Hay in Eureka Springs, Arkansas49.8 mi609 ac726. Alfalfa Hay in Coney Island, Missouri53.8 mi582 ac69.67. Alfalfa Hay in Hollister, Missouri53.8 mi506 ac63.48. Alfalfa Hay in Blue Eye, Missouri48.6 mi385 ac53.89. Alfalfa Hay in Blue Eye, Arkansas47.3 mi376 ac53.210. Alfalfa Hay in Oak Grove, Arkansas45.9 mi356 ac51.6
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Deer?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Newton Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Deer

Barley Hay in Deer, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Deer, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Deer, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Deer, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Deer, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Deer, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 71 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.