HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Heber-Overgaard, Arizona

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Heber-Overgaard.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint0 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth41.8 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence28.9 / 100LOW
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty64.1 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal18.4 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Heber-Overgaard
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Heber-Overgaard. The latest 2025 raster shows 0 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 33rd percentile among 467 analyzed Arizona localities and the 16th percentile nationally. Navajo County reports 956 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Rio Verde, Arizona, 79 miles away with 3,450 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 45.1% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingLIMITED
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 33rd percentile among analyzed Arizona localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles0mapped acres · 0% of radius · 2025

33th percentile among 467 analyzed Arizona localities · 16th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Heber-Overgaard · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
0
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
0 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a9a18bc55968c5047b25691d7f4d
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

28.9 / 100 persistence · LOW

2008: 0 acres · 4th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2009: 0 acres · 7th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2010: 0 acres · 17th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2011: 27 acres · 24th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2012: 1 acres · 19th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2013: 0 acres · 10th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2014: 2 acres · 15th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2015: 0 acres · 15th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2016: 0 acres · 17th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2017: 0 acres · 11th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2018: 0 acres · 6th regional percentile · 10th national percentile2019: 0 acres · 10th regional percentile · 7th national percentile2020: 0 acres · 10th regional percentile · 7th national percentile2021: 1 acres · 7th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2022: 1 acres · 7th regional percentile · 9th national percentile2023: 1 acres · 6th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2024: 0 acres · 27th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2025: 0 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 16th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

41.8production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
956 acres

Navajo County · 2022

How calculated

Navajo County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04017:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
956 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9190439b2ac7b1253ccb0e0e5c29
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
49 farms

Navajo County · 2022

How calculated

Navajo County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04017:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
49 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ef36d5e38ec2877cd2cbbe810a55
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
956 acres

Navajo County · 2022

How calculated

Navajo County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04017:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
956 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f7a2ea09d25abb4ed372de6e241b
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
49 farms

Navajo County · 2022

How calculated

Navajo County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04017:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
49 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:43fbd7aa4e0932d5d75205865cb6
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
100 percent

Navajo County · 2022

How calculated

Navajo County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04017:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7fffb3d383911b7ccf2821b7ddd3
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
3,357 tons

Navajo County · 2022

How calculated

Navajo County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04017:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,357 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:03077ece0ad70e1060267a134b0b
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3.5 tons/acre

Navajo County · 2022

How calculated

Navajo County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04017:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a72842a29c96bbce81ae673db5f3
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
13,865 head

Navajo County · 2022

How calculated

Navajo County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04017:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
13,865 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:977f64fb4d405dbb79c0f8908516
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
20,363 head

Navajo County · 2022

How calculated

Navajo County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04017:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20,363 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:95e80e6a7107f06a60024f0f2c91
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
10 head

Navajo County · 2022

How calculated

Navajo County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04017:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:aeda4018482a0311cbf36540d072
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
9,919 head

Navajo County · 2022

How calculated

Navajo County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04017:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9,919 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f390d511b902b8019835ecf8f4d4
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Navajo County · 2022

How calculated

Navajo County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04017:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a2416e54a7e8df2f85eef3ac3348
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation18.4 in
How calculated

HEBER (BLACK MESA) RS, AZ US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:86e9e1a7a8b45902794442a1b32d
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature50.2 °F
How calculated

HEBER (BLACK MESA) RS, AZ US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ad89022a92cb3d513463eb3abd17
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance1.6 miles
How calculated

HEBER (BLACK MESA) RS, AZ US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Heber-Overgaard reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a06c58634f81f484668f87b2d8bc
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
87.9 percent

Heber-Overgaard · 2026

How calculated

Heber-Overgaard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dc979fe069edda2459f47db9e71a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
45.1 percent

Heber-Overgaard · 2026

How calculated

Heber-Overgaard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:64065d8ffc13c97fefccd5d25a6f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Heber-Overgaard · 2026

How calculated

Heber-Overgaard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a3b7d75c16f926dcd1ef302341cb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Heber-Overgaard · 2026

How calculated

Heber-Overgaard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b30ea062bab46ec8fba39b7e0b0b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
46.6 0-100

Heber-Overgaard · 2026

How calculated

Heber-Overgaard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2a43827d4e2dc751e2a27b5cab0f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Heber-Overgaard · 2026

How calculated

Heber-Overgaard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5a252e1932f125d78b6097812f65
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
23 weeks

Heber-Overgaard · 2026

How calculated

Heber-Overgaard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:50995274e2f3b4534b5901034e79
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
56.9 0-100

Heber-Overgaard · 2026

How calculated

Heber-Overgaard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:681b741970ce9f80bdb53c744520
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
24.4 0-100

Heber-Overgaard · 2026

How calculated

Heber-Overgaard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b21aa76e3313a42f7bb6b92c1934
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
55.9 0-100

Heber-Overgaard · 2026

How calculated

Heber-Overgaard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b9b2409423754ed79314a186f2f0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
83.8 percent

Heber-Overgaard · 2026

How calculated

Heber-Overgaard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3bfa9549fd62ef44d74e1aecb2f7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
45.2 percent

Heber-Overgaard · 2026

How calculated

Heber-Overgaard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d9e4d7d43339aea1bb1266f16ad5
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

64.1sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Rio Verde, Arizona79.2 mi3,450 ac962. Alfalfa Hay in Top-of-the-World, Arizona77.7 mi168 ac24.83. Alfalfa Hay in Forest Lakes, Arizona14.9 mi0 ac24.34. Alfalfa Hay in Clay Springs, Arizona15.6 mi0 ac24.25. Alfalfa Hay in Pinedale, Arizona18.8 mi0 ac24.16. Alfalfa Hay in Miami, Arizona72.5 mi109 ac23.87. Alfalfa Hay in Christopher Creek, Arizona25.8 mi0 ac23.78. Alfalfa Hay in Hunter Creek, Arizona26.5 mi0 ac23.79. Alfalfa Hay in Haigler Creek, Arizona26.6 mi0 ac23.710. Alfalfa Hay in Linden, Arizona26.7 mi0 ac23.7
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Heber-Overgaard?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Navajo Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Heber-Overgaard

Barley Hay in Heber-Overgaard, ArizonaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Heber-Overgaard, ArizonaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Heber-Overgaard, ArizonaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Heber-Overgaard, ArizonaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Heber-Overgaard, ArizonaContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Heber-Overgaard, ArizonaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.